Bishop of Sioux Falls on Voting Pro-choice
From today's Argus Leader:
The Most Rev. Robert Carlson, bishop of the Sioux Falls Catholic Diocese, seems to agree. Addressing diocesan members openly in August, Carlson wrote that a faithful follower cannot support abortion rights and still be "a Catholic in good standing." He stopped short of calling it a sin for Catholics to vote for Democrats. He cited instead Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger's words that those who vote for a candidate precisely because he or she supports abortion rights are themselves unworthy of Communion.
This story was reported by Washington newspapers and the blogs in late July. Hey, three months late ain't bad! Too bad it's in paragraph 41. Dave Kranz's column today is much better, actually, and he deserves credit. Excerpt:
[The Bishop] doesn't answer "yes" or "no" to the question: Is voting for an abortion-rights candidate a mortal sin? But he refers to his Bishop's Bulletin letter, quoting Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger of Rome.Ratzinger said, "Catholics would be guilty of formal cooperation in evil, and so unworthy to present themselves for Holy Communion, if they were to deliberately vote for a candidate precisely because of the candidate's permissive stance on abortion or euthanasia.
"If one had a properly formed conscience and does not share a candidate's stand in favor of abortion and euthanasia, but votes for the candidate for other reasons, it is considered remote material cooperation, which can be permitted if there are proportionate reasons present, e.g., the candidate would limit abortions."
Daschle raising money for NARAL and Emily's List and shouting about the "right to choose" being "sacred ground" is a problem, in other words.
UPDATE: Some readers are not satisfied with this reporting. They wonder why all the information in Jody Bottum's essay "Tom Daschle's Duty to be Morally Coherent" is left out. It explains how the Bishop asked Daschle to stop calling himself Catholic and church teachings behind this request. Another offered a reminder about all the tensions between the Bishop and Daschle on the partial-birth abortion front (more on that later). Also, all the information about Daschle's history on the abortion issue which was included in this thoroughly-researched Rapid City Journal piece is missing. So ok, I agree, the Argus has to do lots more reporting on this front.
