I see that the Argus is running an AP piece about some friction between the Thune camp and Russell Means. Here's the double-standard. The AP, and the Rapid City Journal, wrote big pieces last winter about Means' endorsement of Thune and all the things Means has said about the Democrats and the Argus did NOT run them. This really says it all about the editorial decisions made at the Argus: "You say it's not good for Thune?!? RUN IT!" "Is it good for Thune?? Skip it!" For more on who makes the decisions on what political stories run in the Argus see this (note he thinks Republicans are "evil").